Performance comparison: which is faster?
Ryzen 5 1400 (AMD, 2017) and AMD FX-8320 (AMD, 2012) are compared here. Compare not only scores, but also whether the motherboard can be reused and which GPU class is balanced with each CPU.
Overall performance: Ryzen 5 1400 is about 5.9% faster
The sockets differ (AM4 / AM3+), so switching requires a motherboard replacement. For games, performance balance with the GPU (guideline CPU:GPU = 0.9:1) matters more than CPU speed alone.
Relative performance score (higher is faster). Actual speed varies by workload, cooling, and memory configuration.
| Item | Ryzen 5 1400 | FX-8320 |
|---|---|---|
| Performance Score | 9,000 | 8,500 |
| Generation | Ryzen 1000 | FX |
| Socket | AM4 | AM3+ |
| Release Year | 2017 | 2012 |
| Type | Desktop | Desktop |
| Compatible GPU Example | GeForce RTX 3050 | Radeon RX 5500 XT |
| If You Want To... | Recommended |
|---|---|
| Prioritize maximum speed for heavy work or a high-end GPU | Ryzen 5 1400 |
| Upgrade while reusing the current motherboard | Choose the CPU matching your motherboard socket |
| Prioritize value and adequate performance | FX-8320 (the lower model is often sufficient) |
Ryzen 5 1400 is about 5.9% higher by score (Ryzen 5 1400: 9000 points / FX-8320: 8500 points). For gaming, the GPU tier usually matters more than a few percent of CPU difference. For CPU-heavy work such as video editing and streaming, choose the faster CPU.
Ryzen 5 1400 is Ryzen 1000, while FX-8320 is FX.The sockets differ (AM4 / AM3+), so switching requires a motherboard replacement.
Using our CPU:GPU = 0.9:1 guideline, GeForce RTX 3050 pairs well with Ryzen 5 1400 and Radeon RX 5500 XT pairs well with FX-8320. If either GPU is too strong or too weak, one part holds the other back.
