Performance comparison: which is faster?
Xeon Gold 6354 (Intel, 2021) and Xeon E5-2690 v4 (Intel, 2016) are compared here. Compare not only scores, but also whether the motherboard can be reused and which GPU class is balanced with each CPU.
Overall performance: Xeon Gold 6354 is about 90.9% faster
The sockets differ (LGA4189 / LGA2011-3), so switching requires a motherboard replacement. For games, performance balance with the GPU (guideline CPU:GPU = 0.9:1) matters more than CPU speed alone.
Relative performance score (higher is faster). Actual speed varies by workload, cooling, and memory configuration.
| Item | Xeon Gold 6354 | Xeon E5-2690 v4 |
|---|---|---|
| Performance Score | 42,000 | 22,000 |
| Generation | Xeon | Xeon |
| Socket | LGA4189 | LGA2011-3 |
| Release Year | 2021 | 2016 |
| Type | Server | Server |
| Compatible GPU Example | GeForce RTX 2080 SUPER | GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU |
| If You Want To... | Recommended |
|---|---|
| Prioritize maximum speed for heavy work or a high-end GPU | Xeon Gold 6354 |
| Upgrade while reusing the current motherboard | Choose the CPU matching your motherboard socket |
| Prioritize value and adequate performance | Xeon E5-2690 v4 (the lower model is often sufficient) |
Xeon Gold 6354 is about 90.9% higher by score (Xeon Gold 6354: 42000 points / Xeon E5-2690 v4: 22000 points). For gaming, the GPU tier usually matters more than a few percent of CPU difference. For CPU-heavy work such as video editing and streaming, choose the faster CPU.
Both are Xeon-generation CPUs.The sockets differ (LGA4189 / LGA2011-3), so switching requires a motherboard replacement.
Using our CPU:GPU = 0.9:1 guideline, GeForce RTX 2080 SUPER pairs well with Xeon Gold 6354 and GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU pairs well with Xeon E5-2690 v4. If either GPU is too strong or too weak, one part holds the other back.
