Performance comparison: which is faster?
Intel Arc A770 16GB (Intel, 2022) and Intel Arc A310 4GB (Intel, 2023) are compared here. Compare scores and VRAM, generative AI usability, and CPUs that pair well with each GPU.
Overall performance: Arc A770 16GB is about 275% faster
For generative AI, the higher-VRAM Arc A770 16GB（16GB） has the advantage. For gaming, prioritize performance score and CPU compatibility; for AI, prioritize VRAM.
Relative performance score (higher is faster). Actual fps varies by resolution, game, and CPU configuration.
| Item | Arc A770 16GB | Arc A310 4GB |
|---|---|---|
| Performance Score | 15,000 | 4,000 |
| VRAM | 16GB | 4GB |
| Manufacturer | Intel | Intel |
| Series | Arc | Arc |
| Release Year | 2022 | 2023 |
| Compatible CPU Example | Ryzen 7 1800X | AMD Phenom II X4 945 |
These generative AI models can run on only one GPU because of the VRAM difference (Stable Diffusion, Flux, LLMs, and others).
— None (all models that run on Arc A770 16GB also run here)
| If You Want To... | Recommended |
|---|---|
| Prioritize high fps and smooth performance in demanding games | Arc A770 16GB |
| Run larger generative AI and LLM models | Arc A770 16GB |
| Prioritize value and adequate performance | Arc A310 4GB (the lower model is often sufficient) |
Arc A770 16GB is about 275% higher by score (Arc A770 16GB: 15000 points / Arc A310 4GB: 4000 points). Actual fps also varies by resolution, game, and CPU, so price is a reasonable deciding factor when the gap is only a few percent.
Arc A770 16GB has 16GB of VRAM, while Arc A310 4GB has 4GB; Arc A770 16GB has more. If image generation or a local LLM is even a possibility, the higher-VRAM option provides more room.
Using our guideline, Ryzen 7 1800X pairs well with Arc A770 16GB and AMD Phenom II X4 945 with Arc A310 4GB (CPU:GPU ≈ 0.9:1). If the CPU is too weak, replacing the GPU may not raise fps, so check the combination before buying.
