Performance comparison: which is faster?
UHD Graphics 620 (Intel, 2017) and HD Graphics 4000 (Intel, 2012) are compared here. Compare scores and VRAM, generative AI usability, and CPUs that pair well with each GPU.
Overall performance: UHD Graphics 620 is about 74% faster
Both have Shared of VRAM, so they support a similar range of generative AI models. For gaming, prioritize performance score and CPU compatibility; for AI, prioritize VRAM.
Relative performance score (higher is faster). Actual fps varies by resolution, game, and CPU configuration.
| Item | UHD Graphics 620 | HD Graphics 4000 |
|---|---|---|
| Performance Score | 870 | 500 |
| VRAM | Shared | Shared |
| Manufacturer | Intel | Intel |
| Series | Integrated | Integrated |
| Release Year | 2017 | 2012 |
| Compatible CPU Example | Core 2 Quad Q6600 | Core 2 Quad Q6600 |
| If You Want To... | Recommended |
|---|---|
| Prioritize high fps and smooth performance in demanding games | UHD Graphics 620 |
| Run larger generative AI and LLM models | UHD Graphics 620 |
| Prioritize value and adequate performance | HD Graphics 4000 (the lower model is often sufficient) |
UHD Graphics 620 is about 74% higher by score (UHD Graphics 620: 870 points / HD Graphics 4000: 500 points). Actual fps also varies by resolution, game, and CPU, so price is a reasonable deciding factor when the gap is only a few percent.
Both have Shared of VRAM, so the range of generative AI models they can run is nearly the same.
Using our guideline, Core 2 Quad Q6600 pairs well with UHD Graphics 620 and Core 2 Quad Q6600 with HD Graphics 4000 (CPU:GPU ≈ 0.9:1). If the CPU is too weak, replacing the GPU may not raise fps, so check the combination before buying.
→ UHD Graphics 620 Details ／ HD Graphics 4000 Details ／ Compare Another Combination
