Performance comparison: which is faster?
UHD Graphics 630 (Intel, 2017) and HD Graphics 4600 (Intel, 2013) are compared here. Compare scores and VRAM, generative AI usability, and CPUs that pair well with each GPU.
Overall performance: UHD Graphics 630 is about 42.9% faster
Both have Shared of VRAM, so they support a similar range of generative AI models. For gaming, prioritize performance score and CPU compatibility; for AI, prioritize VRAM.
Relative performance score (higher is faster). Actual fps varies by resolution, game, and CPU configuration.
| Item | UHD Graphics 630 | HD Graphics 4600 |
|---|---|---|
| Performance Score | 1,000 | 700 |
| VRAM | Shared | Shared |
| Manufacturer | Intel | Intel |
| Series | Integrated | Integrated |
| Release Year | 2017 | 2013 |
| Compatible CPU Example | Core 2 Quad Q6600 | Core 2 Quad Q6600 |
| If You Want To... | Recommended |
|---|---|
| Prioritize high fps and smooth performance in demanding games | UHD Graphics 630 |
| Run larger generative AI and LLM models | UHD Graphics 630 |
| Prioritize value and adequate performance | HD Graphics 4600 (the lower model is often sufficient) |
UHD Graphics 630 is about 42.9% higher by score (UHD Graphics 630: 1000 points / HD Graphics 4600: 700 points). Actual fps also varies by resolution, game, and CPU, so price is a reasonable deciding factor when the gap is only a few percent.
Both have Shared of VRAM, so the range of generative AI models they can run is nearly the same.
Using our guideline, Core 2 Quad Q6600 pairs well with UHD Graphics 630 and Core 2 Quad Q6600 with HD Graphics 4600 (CPU:GPU ≈ 0.9:1). If the CPU is too weak, replacing the GPU may not raise fps, so check the combination before buying.
→ UHD Graphics 630 Details ／ HD Graphics 4600 Details ／ Compare Another Combination
