Performance comparison: which is faster?
GeForce GTX 460 (NVIDIA, 2010) and GeForce GTX 650 (NVIDIA, 2012) are compared here. Compare scores and VRAM, generative AI usability, and CPUs that pair well with each GPU.
Overall performance: GTX 460 is about 27.3% faster
Both have 1GB of VRAM, so they support a similar range of generative AI models. For gaming, prioritize performance score and CPU compatibility; for AI, prioritize VRAM.
Relative performance score (higher is faster). Actual fps varies by resolution, game, and CPU configuration.
| Item | GTX 460 | GTX 650 |
|---|---|---|
| Performance Score | 2,800 | 2,200 |
| VRAM | 1GB | 1GB |
| Manufacturer | NVIDIA | NVIDIA |
| Series | GTX 400 | GTX 600 |
| Release Year | 2010 | 2012 |
| Compatible CPU Example | AMD Athlon II X3 445 | AMD Athlon II X2 250 |
| If You Want To... | Recommended |
|---|---|
| Prioritize high fps and smooth performance in demanding games | GTX 460 |
| Run larger generative AI and LLM models | GTX 460 |
| Prioritize value and adequate performance | GTX 650 (the lower model is often sufficient) |
GTX 460 is about 27.3% higher by score (GTX 460: 2800 points / GTX 650: 2200 points). Actual fps also varies by resolution, game, and CPU, so price is a reasonable deciding factor when the gap is only a few percent.
Both have 1GB of VRAM, so the range of generative AI models they can run is nearly the same.
Using our guideline, AMD Athlon II X3 445 pairs well with GTX 460 and AMD Athlon II X2 250 with GTX 650 (CPU:GPU ≈ 0.9:1). If the CPU is too weak, replacing the GPU may not raise fps, so check the combination before buying.
→ GTX 460 Details ／ GTX 650 Details ／ Compare Another Combination
