Performance comparison: which is faster?
GeForce GTX 650 (NVIDIA, 2012) and GeForce GT 1030 (NVIDIA, 2017) are compared here. Compare scores and VRAM, generative AI usability, and CPUs that pair well with each GPU.
Overall performance: GTX 650 is about 37.5% faster
For generative AI, the higher-VRAM GT 1030（2GB） has the advantage. For gaming, prioritize performance score and CPU compatibility; for AI, prioritize VRAM.
Relative performance score (higher is faster). Actual fps varies by resolution, game, and CPU configuration.
| Item | GTX 650 | GT 1030 |
|---|---|---|
| Performance Score | 2,200 | 1,600 |
| VRAM | 1GB | 2GB |
| Manufacturer | NVIDIA | NVIDIA |
| Series | GTX 600 | GT |
| Release Year | 2012 | 2017 |
| Compatible CPU Example | AMD Athlon II X2 250 | Core 2 Duo E7500 |
These generative AI models can run on only one GPU because of the VRAM difference (Stable Diffusion, Flux, LLMs, and others).
— None (all models that run on GT 1030 also run here)
| If You Want To... | Recommended |
|---|---|
| Prioritize high fps and smooth performance in demanding games | GTX 650 |
| Run larger generative AI and LLM models | GT 1030 |
| Prioritize value and adequate performance | GT 1030 (the lower model is often sufficient) |
GTX 650 is about 37.5% higher by score (GTX 650: 2200 points / GT 1030: 1600 points). Actual fps also varies by resolution, game, and CPU, so price is a reasonable deciding factor when the gap is only a few percent.
GTX 650 has 1GB of VRAM, while GT 1030 has 2GB; GT 1030 has more. If image generation or a local LLM is even a possibility, the higher-VRAM option provides more room.
Using our guideline, AMD Athlon II X2 250 pairs well with GTX 650 and Core 2 Duo E7500 with GT 1030 (CPU:GPU ≈ 0.9:1). If the CPU is too weak, replacing the GPU may not raise fps, so check the combination before buying.
→ GTX 650 Details ／ GT 1030 Details ／ Compare Another Combination
