Performance comparison: which is faster?
GeForce GTX 690 (NVIDIA, 2012) and GeForce GTX 760 (NVIDIA, 2014) are compared here. Compare scores and VRAM, generative AI usability, and CPUs that pair well with each GPU.
Overall performance: GTX 690 is about 17.8% faster
For generative AI, the higher-VRAM GTX 690（4GB） has the advantage. For gaming, prioritize performance score and CPU compatibility; for AI, prioritize VRAM.
Relative performance score (higher is faster). Actual fps varies by resolution, game, and CPU configuration.
| Item | GTX 690 | GTX 760 |
|---|---|---|
| Performance Score | 5,300 | 4,500 |
| VRAM | 4GB | 2GB |
| Manufacturer | NVIDIA | NVIDIA |
| Series | GTX 600 | GTX 700 |
| Release Year | 2012 | 2014 |
| Compatible CPU Example | Core i3-4170 | AMD FX-4100 |
These generative AI models can run on only one GPU because of the VRAM difference (Stable Diffusion, Flux, LLMs, and others).
— None (all models that run on GTX 690 also run here)
| If You Want To... | Recommended |
|---|---|
| Prioritize high fps and smooth performance in demanding games | GTX 690 |
| Run larger generative AI and LLM models | GTX 690 |
| Prioritize value and adequate performance | GTX 760 (the lower model is often sufficient) |
GTX 690 is about 17.8% higher by score (GTX 690: 5300 points / GTX 760: 4500 points). Actual fps also varies by resolution, game, and CPU, so price is a reasonable deciding factor when the gap is only a few percent.
GTX 690 has 4GB of VRAM, while GTX 760 has 2GB; GTX 690 has more. If image generation or a local LLM is even a possibility, the higher-VRAM option provides more room.
Using our guideline, Core i3-4170 pairs well with GTX 690 and AMD FX-4100 with GTX 760 (CPU:GPU ≈ 0.9:1). If the CPU is too weak, replacing the GPU may not raise fps, so check the combination before buying.
→ GTX 690 Details ／ GTX 760 Details ／ Compare Another Combination
