Performance comparison: which is faster?
GeForce GTX 770 (NVIDIA, 2014) and GeForce GTX 680 (NVIDIA, 2012) are compared here. Compare scores and VRAM, generative AI usability, and CPUs that pair well with each GPU.
Overall performance: GTX 770 is about 3.8% faster
Both have 2GB of VRAM, so they support a similar range of generative AI models. For gaming, prioritize performance score and CPU compatibility; for AI, prioritize VRAM.
Relative performance score (higher is faster). Actual fps varies by resolution, game, and CPU configuration.
| Item | GTX 770 | GTX 680 |
|---|---|---|
| Performance Score | 5,400 | 5,200 |
| VRAM | 2GB | 2GB |
| Manufacturer | NVIDIA | NVIDIA |
| Series | GTX 700 | GTX 600 |
| Release Year | 2014 | 2012 |
| Compatible CPU Example | AMD FX-4300 | Core i3-4170 |
| If You Want To... | Recommended |
|---|---|
| Prioritize high fps and smooth performance in demanding games | GTX 770 |
| Run larger generative AI and LLM models | GTX 770 |
| Prioritize value and adequate performance | GTX 680 (the lower model is often sufficient) |
GTX 770 is about 3.8% higher by score (GTX 770: 5400 points / GTX 680: 5200 points). Actual fps also varies by resolution, game, and CPU, so price is a reasonable deciding factor when the gap is only a few percent.
Both have 2GB of VRAM, so the range of generative AI models they can run is nearly the same.
Using our guideline, AMD FX-4300 pairs well with GTX 770 and Core i3-4170 with GTX 680 (CPU:GPU ≈ 0.9:1). If the CPU is too weak, replacing the GPU may not raise fps, so check the combination before buying.
→ GTX 770 Details ／ GTX 680 Details ／ Compare Another Combination
