Performance comparison: which is faster?
GeForce GTX 980 (NVIDIA, 2015) and GeForce GTX 1650 (NVIDIA, 2019) are compared here. Compare scores and VRAM, generative AI usability, and CPUs that pair well with each GPU.
Overall performance: GTX 980 is about 18.6% faster
Both have 4GB of VRAM, so they support a similar range of generative AI models. For gaming, prioritize performance score and CPU compatibility; for AI, prioritize VRAM.
Relative performance score (higher is faster). Actual fps varies by resolution, game, and CPU configuration.
| Item | GTX 980 | GTX 1650 |
|---|---|---|
| Performance Score | 8,300 | 7,000 |
| VRAM | 4GB | 4GB |
| Manufacturer | NVIDIA | NVIDIA |
| Series | GTX 900 | GTX 16 |
| Release Year | 2015 | 2019 |
| Compatible CPU Example | Ryzen 3 1300X | Ryzen 3 1200 |
| If You Want To... | Recommended |
|---|---|
| Prioritize high fps and smooth performance in demanding games | GTX 980 |
| Run larger generative AI and LLM models | GTX 980 |
| Prioritize value and adequate performance | GTX 1650 (the lower model is often sufficient) |
GTX 980 is about 18.6% higher by score (GTX 980: 8300 points / GTX 1650: 7000 points). Actual fps also varies by resolution, game, and CPU, so price is a reasonable deciding factor when the gap is only a few percent.
Both have 4GB of VRAM, so the range of generative AI models they can run is nearly the same.
Using our guideline, Ryzen 3 1300X pairs well with GTX 980 and Ryzen 3 1200 with GTX 1650 (CPU:GPU ≈ 0.9:1). If the CPU is too weak, replacing the GPU may not raise fps, so check the combination before buying.
→ GTX 980 Details ／ GTX 1650 Details ／ Compare Another Combination
