Performance comparison: which is faster?
GeForce RTX 2060 (NVIDIA, 2019) and GeForce GTX 1660 (NVIDIA, 2019) are compared here. Compare scores and VRAM, generative AI usability, and CPUs that pair well with each GPU.
Overall performance: RTX 2060 is about 16.2% faster
Both have 6GB of VRAM, so they support a similar range of generative AI models. For gaming, prioritize performance score and CPU compatibility; for AI, prioritize VRAM.
Relative performance score (higher is faster). Actual fps varies by resolution, game, and CPU configuration.
| Item | RTX 2060 | GTX 1660 |
|---|---|---|
| Performance Score | 11,500 | 9,900 |
| VRAM | 6GB | 6GB |
| Manufacturer | NVIDIA | NVIDIA |
| Series | RTX 20 | GTX 16 |
| Release Year | 2019 | 2019 |
| Compatible CPU Example | Core i7-6700 | Core i7-3770K |
| If You Want To... | Recommended |
|---|---|
| Prioritize high fps and smooth performance in demanding games | RTX 2060 |
| Run larger generative AI and LLM models | RTX 2060 |
| Prioritize value and adequate performance | GTX 1660 (the lower model is often sufficient) |
RTX 2060 is about 16.2% higher by score (RTX 2060: 11500 points / GTX 1660: 9900 points). Actual fps also varies by resolution, game, and CPU, so price is a reasonable deciding factor when the gap is only a few percent.
Both have 6GB of VRAM, so the range of generative AI models they can run is nearly the same.
Using our guideline, Core i7-6700 pairs well with RTX 2060 and Core i7-3770K with GTX 1660 (CPU:GPU ≈ 0.9:1). If the CPU is too weak, replacing the GPU may not raise fps, so check the combination before buying.
