Performance comparison: which is faster?
GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU (NVIDIA, 2023) and GeForce GTX 1660 Ti (NVIDIA, 2019) are compared here. Compare scores and VRAM, generative AI usability, and CPUs that pair well with each GPU.
Overall performance: RTX 4050 Laptop GPU is about 13.6% faster
Both have 6GB of VRAM, so they support a similar range of generative AI models. For gaming, prioritize performance score and CPU compatibility; for AI, prioritize VRAM.
Relative performance score (higher is faster). Actual fps varies by resolution, game, and CPU configuration.
| Item | RTX 4050 Laptop GPU | GTX 1660 Ti |
|---|---|---|
| Performance Score | 12,500 | 11,000 |
| VRAM | 6GB | 6GB |
| Manufacturer | NVIDIA | NVIDIA |
| Series | RTX 40 | GTX 16 |
| Release Year | 2023 | 2019 |
| Compatible CPU Example | Core Ultra 5 135U | Ryzen 3 2300X |
| If You Want To... | Recommended |
|---|---|
| Prioritize high fps and smooth performance in demanding games | RTX 4050 Laptop GPU |
| Run larger generative AI and LLM models | RTX 4050 Laptop GPU |
| Prioritize value and adequate performance | GTX 1660 Ti (the lower model is often sufficient) |
RTX 4050 Laptop GPU is about 13.6% higher by score (RTX 4050 Laptop GPU: 12500 points / GTX 1660 Ti: 11000 points). Actual fps also varies by resolution, game, and CPU, so price is a reasonable deciding factor when the gap is only a few percent.
Both have 6GB of VRAM, so the range of generative AI models they can run is nearly the same.
Using our guideline, Core Ultra 5 135U pairs well with RTX 4050 Laptop GPU and Ryzen 3 2300X with GTX 1660 Ti (CPU:GPU ≈ 0.9:1). If the CPU is too weak, replacing the GPU may not raise fps, so check the combination before buying.
→ RTX 4050 Laptop GPU Details ／ GTX 1660 Ti Details ／ Compare Another Combination
