Performance comparison: which is faster?
GeForce GTX 1050 Ti (NVIDIA, 2016) and GeForce GTX 690 (NVIDIA, 2012) are compared here. Compare scores and VRAM, generative AI usability, and CPUs that pair well with each GPU.
Overall performance: GTX 1050 Ti is about 3.8% faster
Both have 4GB of VRAM, so they support a similar range of generative AI models. For gaming, prioritize performance score and CPU compatibility; for AI, prioritize VRAM.
Relative performance score (higher is faster). Actual fps varies by resolution, game, and CPU configuration.
| Item | GTX 1050 Ti | GTX 690 |
|---|---|---|
| Performance Score | 5,500 | 5,300 |
| VRAM | 4GB | 4GB |
| Manufacturer | NVIDIA | NVIDIA |
| Series | GTX 10 | GTX 600 |
| Release Year | 2016 | 2012 |
| Compatible CPU Example | AMD FX-4300 | Core i3-4170 |
| If You Want To... | Recommended |
|---|---|
| Prioritize high fps and smooth performance in demanding games | GTX 1050 Ti |
| Run larger generative AI and LLM models | GTX 1050 Ti |
| Prioritize value and adequate performance | GTX 690 (the lower model is often sufficient) |
GTX 1050 Ti is about 3.8% higher by score (GTX 1050 Ti: 5500 points / GTX 690: 5300 points). Actual fps also varies by resolution, game, and CPU, so price is a reasonable deciding factor when the gap is only a few percent.
Both have 4GB of VRAM, so the range of generative AI models they can run is nearly the same.
Using our guideline, AMD FX-4300 pairs well with GTX 1050 Ti and Core i3-4170 with GTX 690 (CPU:GPU ≈ 0.9:1). If the CPU is too weak, replacing the GPU may not raise fps, so check the combination before buying.
→ GTX 1050 Ti Details ／ GTX 690 Details ／ Compare Another Combination
