Performance comparison: which is faster?
GeForce GTX 1050 (NVIDIA, 2016) and GeForce GTX 760 (NVIDIA, 2014) are compared here. Compare scores and VRAM, generative AI usability, and CPUs that pair well with each GPU.
Overall performance: nearly equal
Both have 2GB of VRAM, so they support a similar range of generative AI models. For gaming, prioritize performance score and CPU compatibility; for AI, prioritize VRAM.
Relative performance score (higher is faster). Actual fps varies by resolution, game, and CPU configuration.
| Item | GTX 1050 | GTX 760 |
|---|---|---|
| Performance Score | 4,500 | 4,500 |
| VRAM | 2GB | 2GB |
| Manufacturer | NVIDIA | NVIDIA |
| Series | GTX 10 | GTX 700 |
| Release Year | 2016 | 2014 |
| Compatible CPU Example | AMD FX-4100 | AMD FX-4100 |
| If You Want To... | Recommended |
|---|---|
| Prioritize high fps and smooth performance in demanding games | GTX 1050 |
| Run larger generative AI and LLM models | GTX 1050 |
| Prioritize value and adequate performance | GTX 1050 (the lower model is often sufficient) |
Their scores are nearly identical (GTX 1050: 4500 points / GTX 760: 4500 points). In this case, compare price, VRAM, and power draw.
Both have 2GB of VRAM, so the range of generative AI models they can run is nearly the same.
Using our guideline, AMD FX-4100 pairs well with GTX 1050 and AMD FX-4100 with GTX 760 (CPU:GPU ≈ 0.9:1). If the CPU is too weak, replacing the GPU may not raise fps, so check the combination before buying.
→ GTX 1050 Details ／ GTX 760 Details ／ Compare Another Combination
