Performance comparison: which is faster?
Radeon R9 290 (AMD, 2014) and Radeon R9 380X (AMD, 2015) are compared here. Compare scores and VRAM, generative AI usability, and CPUs that pair well with each GPU.
Overall performance: R9 290 is about 9.1% faster
Both have 4GB of VRAM, so they support a similar range of generative AI models. For gaming, prioritize performance score and CPU compatibility; for AI, prioritize VRAM.
Relative performance score (higher is faster). Actual fps varies by resolution, game, and CPU configuration.
| Item | R9 290 | R9 380X |
|---|---|---|
| Performance Score | 6,000 | 5,500 |
| VRAM | 4GB | 4GB |
| Manufacturer | AMD | AMD |
| Series | R9 | R9 |
| Release Year | 2014 | 2015 |
| Compatible CPU Example | Core i3-7100 | AMD FX-4300 |
| If You Want To... | Recommended |
|---|---|
| Prioritize high fps and smooth performance in demanding games | R9 290 |
| Run larger generative AI and LLM models | R9 290 |
| Prioritize value and adequate performance | R9 380X (the lower model is often sufficient) |
R9 290 is about 9.1% higher by score (R9 290: 6000 points / R9 380X: 5500 points). Actual fps also varies by resolution, game, and CPU, so price is a reasonable deciding factor when the gap is only a few percent.
Both have 4GB of VRAM, so the range of generative AI models they can run is nearly the same.
Using our guideline, Core i3-7100 pairs well with R9 290 and AMD FX-4300 with R9 380X (CPU:GPU ≈ 0.9:1). If the CPU is too weak, replacing the GPU may not raise fps, so check the combination before buying.
→ R9 290 Details ／ R9 380X Details ／ Compare Another Combination
