Performance comparison: which is faster?
GeForce GT 1030 (NVIDIA, 2017) and GeForce GT 730 (NVIDIA, 2014) are compared here. Compare scores and VRAM, generative AI usability, and CPUs that pair well with each GPU.
Overall performance: GT 1030 is about 33.3% faster
Both have 2GB of VRAM, so they support a similar range of generative AI models. For gaming, prioritize performance score and CPU compatibility; for AI, prioritize VRAM.
Relative performance score (higher is faster). Actual fps varies by resolution, game, and CPU configuration.
| Item | GT 1030 | GT 730 |
|---|---|---|
| Performance Score | 1,600 | 1,200 |
| VRAM | 2GB | 2GB |
| Manufacturer | NVIDIA | NVIDIA |
| Series | GT | GT |
| Release Year | 2017 | 2014 |
| Compatible CPU Example | Core 2 Duo E7500 | Core 2 Quad Q6600 |
| If You Want To... | Recommended |
|---|---|
| Prioritize high fps and smooth performance in demanding games | GT 1030 |
| Run larger generative AI and LLM models | GT 1030 |
| Prioritize value and adequate performance | GT 730 (the lower model is often sufficient) |
GT 1030 is about 33.3% higher by score (GT 1030: 1600 points / GT 730: 1200 points). Actual fps also varies by resolution, game, and CPU, so price is a reasonable deciding factor when the gap is only a few percent.
Both have 2GB of VRAM, so the range of generative AI models they can run is nearly the same.
Using our guideline, Core 2 Duo E7500 pairs well with GT 1030 and Core 2 Quad Q6600 with GT 730 (CPU:GPU ≈ 0.9:1). If the CPU is too weak, replacing the GPU may not raise fps, so check the combination before buying.
→ GT 1030 Details ／ GT 730 Details ／ Compare Another Combination
