Performance comparison: which is faster?
GeForce GTX 1650 (NVIDIA, 2019) and GeForce GTX 780 (NVIDIA, 2014) are compared here. Compare scores and VRAM, generative AI usability, and CPUs that pair well with each GPU.
Overall performance: GTX 1650 is about 11.1% faster
For generative AI, the higher-VRAM GTX 1650（4GB） has the advantage. For gaming, prioritize performance score and CPU compatibility; for AI, prioritize VRAM.
Relative performance score (higher is faster). Actual fps varies by resolution, game, and CPU configuration.
| Item | GTX 1650 | GTX 780 |
|---|---|---|
| Performance Score | 7,000 | 6,300 |
| VRAM | 4GB | 3GB |
| Manufacturer | NVIDIA | NVIDIA |
| Series | GTX 16 | GTX 700 |
| Release Year | 2019 | 2014 |
| Compatible CPU Example | Ryzen 3 1200 | AMD A10-7890K |
These generative AI models can run on only one GPU because of the VRAM difference (Stable Diffusion, Flux, LLMs, and others).
— None (all models that run on GTX 1650 also run here)
| If You Want To... | Recommended |
|---|---|
| Prioritize high fps and smooth performance in demanding games | GTX 1650 |
| Run larger generative AI and LLM models | GTX 1650 |
| Prioritize value and adequate performance | GTX 780 (the lower model is often sufficient) |
GTX 1650 is about 11.1% higher by score (GTX 1650: 7000 points / GTX 780: 6300 points). Actual fps also varies by resolution, game, and CPU, so price is a reasonable deciding factor when the gap is only a few percent.
GTX 1650 has 4GB of VRAM, while GTX 780 has 3GB; GTX 1650 has more. If image generation or a local LLM is even a possibility, the higher-VRAM option provides more room.
Using our guideline, Ryzen 3 1200 pairs well with GTX 1650 and AMD A10-7890K with GTX 780 (CPU:GPU ≈ 0.9:1). If the CPU is too weak, replacing the GPU may not raise fps, so check the combination before buying.
→ GTX 1650 Details ／ GTX 780 Details ／ Compare Another Combination
